نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکترای سیاستگذاری علم و فناوری دانشگاه تهران
2 استاد گروه مدیریت دولتی دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Social changes have usually happened with the aim of improving the human condition. However, sometimes human has been ignored! Human should be regarded as the focus of improvement projects. This idea should always be considered in the programs related to the changes that humans have to be initially changed so they can improve their living conditions. Respecting human personality and maintaining his/her dignity has had special status in Imam Ali's (AS) political, economic and social policy makings. This study, by using 3c's model, was to have a descriptive-analytic investigation of objectives and indicators of social development and excellence in the three branches concerning behavior, structure and context in the light of the views of Imam Ali (AS). The statistical population of this study contained experts and scholars in Islamic sciences, communication, social sciences and anthropology. All were specialist in the field of research. The research sample consisted of 118 experienced professors and experts in the fields mentioned above, chosen through snowball sampling.
In this study, first, by content analysis method, the indicators of social development and excellence were identified based on Imam Ali's guidelines. Then the initial codes have been reviewed and analyzed several times using MAXQDA and 102 components were determined. Then the fuzzy Delphi technique was used to test the results. At last, 60 basic themes concerning human progress and excellence of the data set were identified. From 60 basic themes of the social progress and excellence 33 factors related to content, 8 factors to structure and 19 factors concerning context which were finally confirmed.
کلیدواژهها [English]
* قرآن کریم
21. Braun, V. & V. Clarke, 2006, “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2): 77−101.
22. Chang, Y. H. (1998). Transportation plan appraisal and decision making−discussion and application of the fuzzy theory, Hwatai, Taipei.
23. Chen, M. K., & Wang, S. C. (2010). “The use of a hybrid fuzzy−Delphi−AHP approach to develop global business intelligence for information service firms” Expert Systems with Applications. 37: 7394−7407.
24. Conn, R, W. (1994). “Strategic goals and development pathways for fusion”. Fusion Engineering and Design, 25: 1–4.
25. Davies, M. A. P. (1994). “A multicriteria decision model application for managing group decisions”. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45: 47−58.
26. Harvard. Little, A & Green, A. (2009), “Successful globalisation, education and sustainable. International Journal of Educational Development, 29 (2), 166−174.
27. Johnson, William H.A & Roberto Filippini. (2013). “Integration capabilities as mediator of product development practices–performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management”. 30: 95−111.
28. Kemp, R., & Parto, S. (2005). Governance for sustainable development: moving from theory to practice. International Journal of Sustainable Development,
8: 12–30.
29. Mikhailov, L. (2003). “Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements”. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 134: 365−385.
30. Mirzai, Ahranjani, Hassan. (1976). Rural Development in Theory and Practice. A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the school of public administration university of Southern California, California.
31. Ojo, Adegboyega. Tomasz Janowski & Johanna Awotwi. (2013). “Enabling development through governance and mobile technology”. Government Information Quarterly. 30: 32−45.
32. Ramos, A. G. (1974). The Changing Meaning of Development, University of Southern California. California.
33. Seers, Dudley. (1969). “The Meaning of Development. International Development Review, 11: 59−65.