نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دکترای جامعهشناسی سیاسی، عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه پیام نور مشهد
2 کارشناسی ارشد جامعهشناسی
3 کارشناسی ارشد مطالعات جوانان
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Religiosity of different peoples is one of the challenging issues in sociology of religion; each of the theories in the field confronts serious challenges so that the extent of religiosity and its effective factors have become ambiguous. The main aim of this study is to present a clear elucidation of the extent of religiosity among different peoples. To do so, via the critical evaluation of the updated modernization theory, the theoretical model of cultural interactions is introduced. In the section of theoretical framework cultural globalization was selected as the independent variable and the grounding variables related to this concept, hypotheses and models were analyzed. To test these hypotheses social survey data were used for overall characterization of religiosity of people elucidated. The descriptive findings reveal that, in general, the extent of recognizance to behavioral and value aspects of religion are less than religious faith to God. Moreover, the findings reveal that cultural interaction theory is a relatively powerful pattern in determining the variance of religiosity among the peoples. In addition, this theory presents a different theoretical model from the role and position of human development variables, variety and abundance in religiosity and the theory of religious markets.
کلیدواژهها [English]
12. Albrow, M. (1996), The Global Age: Stated society beyond modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13. Alesina, A. and E. Spolaore (2003), The Size of Nations. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
14. Alesina, A. and E. Spolaore (2003). The Size of Nations. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
15. Appadurai, A. (2000) “The Grounds of the Nation- State: Identity, Violence and Territory”. in, K. Goldman, U. Hannerz & C. Westin. eds, Nationalism and Internationalism in the Post- Cold War Era, London. Rutledge.
16. Appadurai, A. (2000), “The Grounds of the Nation - State: Identity, Violence and Territory”. in, K. Goldman, U. Hannerz & C. Westin. eds, Nationalism and Internationalism in the Post - Cold War Era, London. Rutledge.
17. Barthes, R. (1967), Writing Degree Zero, London, Cape.
18. Beyer, P. (1994), Religion and Globalization. London: Sage.
19. Bruce, S.( 2002), God is Dead:Secularization in the West. Oxford:Blakwell.
20. Bryant, j.(2000)“Cost-benefit Accounting and the Piety Business: Is Homo Religiosis atBottom, a Homo Economicus?”. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion.12: 520-548.
21. Bryant, j.(2000) “Cost-benefit Accounting and the Piety Business: Is Homo Religiosis at Bottom, a Homo Economicus?”. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion.12: 520-548.
22. Chaves, M (2001), “Religious pluralism and religious participation”. Annual Review of sociology.27: 261-281.
23. Crockett, A. (2004), “Religion in Britian neither believing nor belonging”. Seminar given to CHIMERA.
24. Davie, G. (2002), Europe: the exceptional case: parameters of faith in the modern world. London: Darton Longman & Todd.
25. Denzin, N. (1994), Handbook of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA: sage.
26. Friedman, F. (1994), Cultural Identity and Global Process. London: Sage.
27. Geertz, C. (1966), Religion as a Cultural system. London: Tovistock.
28. Gray, C. (1997), Endgames: Questions in Late modern political thought. Cambridge: Polity Press.
29. Gunnell, M. 2007. “Global Cultural Change and the relationship with Thelecommunication change: A Longitudinal Analyses”. Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University.
30. Hadden, J. (1987), “Toward desacralizing secularization theory”. Social Forces, 65(3): 586-61.
31. Hofstede, G. (2001), Cultures consequences: Comparing Values, behaviors, institutions and organization across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: sage.
32. Hustad J. E, Barrio M. (2001), A Small-Scale Stratified Downdraft Gasifier Coupled to a gas Engine for heat and Power Production, Proc 6th International Conference on Technologies and Combustion for Clean Environment, 1269-1276, Lisabon, Portugal, July.
33. Hustad J. E, Barrio M. (2001), A Small-Scale Stratified Downdraft Gasifier Coupled to a gas Engine for heat and Power Production, Proc 6th International Conference on Technologies and Combustion for Clean Environment, 1269-1276, Lisabon, Portugal, July.
34. Hustad J. E., Barrio M. (2001), A Small-Scale Stratified Downdraft Gasifier Coupled to a gas Engine for heat and Power Production, Proc 6th International Conference on Technologies and Combustion for Clean Environment, 1269-1276, Lisabon, Portugal, July.
35. Jameson, F. (1984), Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso.
36. Latouche, S. (1996), The Westernization of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
37. Lyon, D. (1999), Postmodernity. Open University Press.
38. McGrew, A. (1996), Modernity and Its Future.Cambridge: polity.
39. Ragin, C. (1987), The comparative Methods. Berkeley: University of
California press.
40. Ragin, C.(1997), “Turning the Tables: How Case-Oriented Research challenges Variable-Oriented Research”. Comparative Social Research, 16: 27-42.
41. Robertson, R (2000), Humanity, Globalization and Worldwide Religious Resurgence. In Lechner (eds) The Globalization Reader. Oxford: Blakwell.
42. Said, E. (1995), Orientalism. London: Penguin.
43. Schiller, H. (1976), Communication and Cultural Domination. New York: International Art and Science Press.
44. Stark, R.(1985), “A supply-side reinterpretation of the secularization of Europe”. Journal for the scientific study of religion. 33: 230-252.
45. Stark, R.(1999), “Secularization, RIP”. Sociology Of Religion. 60 (3): 249-273.
46. Taylor, P. (1996), “embedded Statism and the Social Science: Opening up to new spaces” Enviroment and Planning A. 28 (11): 28-1917.
47. Tschannen, O.(1991), “The Secularization paradigm: A Systematization”. Journal for the scientific study of religion. 30 (4): 395-415.
48. Waters, M. (1995), Globalization. London: Routledge.
49. Winch, P. (1965), The Idea of a social Science. London: Routledge.
)